HAS MAN REALLY BEEN TO THE MOON

There are some people out there who genuinely believe that man has not been to the moon. At least not in the way NASA would have us believe. There are a number of anomalies or weird things in what they tell us and show us. Here are a few. 1. There are a number of photographs which show anomalies. The moon has no atmosphere there for cannot diffuse light. Yet in a photo of Buzz Aldrin standing on the moons surface with the sun at his back and his shadow falling in front of him, Aldrins suit is brightly lit, when it should be cast in very dark shadow. ( They took no external lights with them.(take up to much room and weight)) 2. The moon is a very dusty place-or so we are told- then why in a close up shot of the landing pads are they spotless, because as they landed the retro-rockets are bound to have stirred up a lot of dust and surely some would have collected on the landing pads? But apparently not. 3. In a photographic enlargement of Aldrins visor you can see in the reflection, an object floating above the lunar horizon. 4. There is filmfootage ( I have not seen it though ) that appears to show the American flag fluttering on the airless lunar surface. 5. In photographs of astronauts footprints left in what NASA describe as very fine, almost powdery moon dust, some researchers claim, that such a fine dust would not leave the kind of impression shown. They allege that the footprints shown are more consistent with those that would be left in moist soil. 6. Some people are of the opinion that, amongst other things, the American people had been told that, before the end of the decade, they would put a man on the moon and bring him back safely again and a sense of national pride forced them to fake the landings, rather than admit failure. 7. In some photographs objects and astronauts are brightly lit that should be in total darkness. Thus suggesting only one thing artificial lighting, which, as I have already stated, they did not take to the moon. 8. The face shields used by the astronauts would have to be effective in temp. between -250 and +250 degrees F. No such material has been invented. 9. If you look at any photo of the landing module, there is no crater beneath it.( caused by the retro-rockets ). Yet we know the moon surface is very dusty. How could it not leave a tell-tale trace in the dust? 10 The Command capsules never returned to earth within sight of the recovery ships. This was to allow the capsule to be dropped from a U.S.A.F. plane. Allegedly. 11. No radio hams were able to tune into the capsule broadcasts, thus making NASA the only source of info. 12. In all lunar photographs there is a lack of stars. This is either because there are none ( but we know there are ) or the moon has an atmosphere. ( which we are told it does not. ) 13. As far back as 1969 Dutch newspapers questioned whether a moon landing had taken place or if it was all part of a massive American funded fake project. 14. Why has man never been back to the moon since the Apollo programme ended. Man has ventured into space no further than three hundred miles above the earths surface. Could this have something to do with the extreme radiation a bit further out into space?

Submitted by Andrew.

Why did NASA not allow the TV cameras to hook up to the transmissions being sent to them from the lunar surface, instead the pictures that we all saw had to be filmed straight off the big screen in mission control

Submitted by Steve.

The astronauts suits where too big to fit through the doorhatch of the Eagle (landind module). I also questioned the lack of any stars on the moon. As this is perhaps the most unusual phenonemae, and i've never heard NASA explain any reason for this.

Submitted by Sue.

One must remember that several pieces of hardware were left behind by the astronauts. I would first question whether any mission subsequent to Apollo 11 arrived on the moon near enough to the original landing site to film the items left by preceeding missions. Barring that evidence (The reason would be simply that NASA wanted to explore different lunar regions, and not concentrate landings around the "Tranquility Base"), some form of telescopic camera equipment could be utilized to photograph the hardware remaining on the lunar surface. Telescopic lenses are sufficiently advanced to be able to focus on the lunar surface either from orbiting shuttles, or geosynchronous satellites, and would provide positive identification of any leftover equipment, proving that the Apollo missions were successful....Submitted by David.

Meet Single Girls and Guys for Dating!

Paralumun New Age Village